Warning Signals in Balance Sheet

This is by no means an exhaustive list, but any one of the signals could mean there is a problem. The more warning signals there are, the higher the risk.

1. Are other debtors large in relation to trade debtors and what are other debtors?

It depends on the specific context and nature of the other receivables. Trade receivables are amounts owed to a company by customers for goods or services sold on credit. Other receivables can include a wide range of items, such as loans or advances to employees or other companies, amounts owed by related parties, or even income tax refunds that are expected to be received.

If other receivables are significantly higher than the trade receivables, this could indicate that the company is highly dependent on non-trade revenue sources or that it has extended a lot of credit to other companies. This could be a warning signal for investors or creditors, as it could indicate increased risk and a lack of diversification in the company’s revenue streams.

However, it’s important to note that the ratio of other receivables to trade receivables can vary widely depending on the industry and the specific business. Therefore, it’s important to analyze the other receivables in the context of the company’s financial statements and operations before making any conclusions.

2. Any evidence of significant deferred expenses and is the deferral period sensible?

Significant deferred expenses can indicate a few potential issues for a business.

  1. Timing mismatch: Deferring expenses can result in a timing mismatch between when the expense is incurred and when it is recognized in the income statement. This can make it difficult to accurately assess a company’s short-term financial performance.
  2. Cash Flow: The deferral of expenses can also affect cash flow. If a company defers a significant amount of expenses, it may not have the cash to pay them when due.
  3. Misrepresentation of financial performance: Deferring expenses can artificially inflate a company’s short-term financial performance. When a significant amount of expenses is deferred, it can give the impression that the company is more profitable than it actually is.

As for the deferral period, it is important for it to be reasonable and in line with industry standards. Deferring expenses for too long can cause the problems noted above. On the other hand, a deferral period that is too short may not be long enough for the full benefit of the expenditure to be realised.

It is important that a company consider the potential impact of deferred expenses on its financial performance and select a deferral period that is reasonable and consistent with industry standards.

3. Any capitalisation of expenses?

Companies typically capitalize expenses when the costs incurred are expected to generate future economic benefits. In accounting terms, capitalizing an expense means treating it as an asset, rather than an immediate expense, on the balance sheet. These capitalized costs are then amortized or depreciated over time, rather than being expensed in the current period. The most common situations where companies capitalize expenses are:

  1. Production costs: capitalize production costs such as materials and labour that are incurred to create inventory that will be sold in the future.
  2. Development costs: capitalize costs associated with research and development activities, such as costs incurred to develop new products or technologies.
  3. Construction costs: capitalize costs associated with building or improving long-term assets such as real estate, factories, and other types of property.
  4. Software development costs: capitalize costs associated with software development.

We need to be aware of the potential impact of capitalization of expenses on a company’s financial statements and financial performance. Capitalizing expenses can make a company’s financial statements appear more profitable in the short-term, as expenses are spread out over time rather than being expensed in the current period. Therefore, we should pay attention to the footnotes to the financial statements, where companies typically provide information on how they are treating certain expenses and look for red flags such as a significant increase in capitalized expenses or a change in the company’s accounting policies. Companies can capitalise interest expenses into cost of assets, thus their interest coverage is distorted.

Retail investors should also be aware that capitalization of expenses can be problematic when it comes to taxes, as the expense may not be tax deductible until it is amortized or depreciated. Deferred tax is common in cases of capitalization of expenses. Therefore, retail investors should also pay attention to the company’s tax situation, as well as its plans for future growth and expansion.

4. Is useful life of fixed assets being extended?

Extending the useful life of fixed assets can potentially cause financial reporting and budgeting problems. It can result in overstating the value of assets on the balance sheet, which can make a company appear more financially sound than it actually is. It can also result in understating depreciation expense, making a company’s profits appear higher than they are. This can also impact budgeting, as the company may allocate less funds to replace these assets, which can lead to operational disruptions in the future. It is important that companies carefully consider the impact of extending the useful lives of fixed assets and disclose any changes in the financial statements.

5. Is property being devalued or re-valued upwards?

A property can be devalued on a balance sheet if its fair value decreases. This can occur due to a variety of reasons, such as a decline in the real estate market, physical damage to the property, or changes in local zoning laws that negatively impact the property’s value. When this happens, the property’s value on the balance sheet is adjusted downward to reflect its current fair value. This can have an impact on a company’s net worth and financial performance.

A decrease in the value of a property on a balance sheet can raise a number of concerns for a company. Some of these concerns include:

  • Reduced net worth: When a property’s value is decreased, the company’s net worth is also decreased. This can negatively impact the company’s financial position and make it more difficult to secure financing or investments.
  • Loss of income: If the property is generating income for the company, a decrease in its value can result in a loss of revenue.
  • Impact on financial statements: A decrease in the value of a property can also have an impact on a company’s financial statements. For example, it can result in a decrease in the company’s assets and a corresponding increase in its liabilities.
  • Negative impact on reputation: A devaluation of property can also affect the company’s reputation and investors’ confidence in the company’s ability to maintain and increase the value of its assets.
  • Compliance issues: If the property is used as collateral for a loan, the devaluation of the property could cause the company to be in breach of loan covenants.

It is important for companies to closely monitor the value of their properties and take action to address any potential issues that may arise as a result of a decrease in value.

A property can be revalued upward on a balance sheet if its fair market value increases. This can occur due to a variety of reasons, such as an improvement in the real estate market, physical improvements made to the property, or changes in local zoning laws that positively impact the property’s value. When this happens, the property’s value on the balance sheet is adjusted upward to reflect its current fair market value. This can have a positive impact on a company’s net worth and financial performance.

While revaluing a property upward on a balance sheet can have positive benefits for a company, there may also be some issues to consider. Some of these issues include:

  • Impact on financial statements: A revaluation of a property can have an impact on a company’s financial statements. For example, it can result in an increase in the company’s assets and a corresponding decrease in its liabilities. This can affect the company’s financial ratios and make them appear more favorable than they actually are.
  • Compliance issues: If the company is required to get an independent valuation of the property and it’s not done, or the revaluation is not in line with accounting standards it could be a compliance issue.
  • Inaccurate representation of financial performance: A revaluation of a property may not reflect the company’s true financial performance, as it is based on the current market value of the property rather than the company’s actual performance.
  • Tax implications: A revaluation of a property may have tax implications. For example, if the property is sold at a profit after being revalued, the company may be required to pay capital gains tax.
  • Misaligned expectations: If the company’s management or investors have unrealistic expectations about the value of the property, they may be disappointed if the revaluation does not meet those expectations.

6. Has profit been achieved largely by the change in one provision?

It is concerning if a significant increase in profit is primarily due to a change in one provision, as it may indicate that the company’s financial stability is dependent on that single provision. It is important to evaluate the long-term sustainability of the company’s financial performance and ensure that there are multiple sources of revenue. Additionally, if the provision in question is unethical or illegal, it could lead to legal and reputational risks for the company. It is important for a company to have a diversified and sustainable financial strategy.



Explore other chapters and guides

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top